Offsetting emissions generated by fracking could cost up to $4.3 billion per year when the shale gas industry is at full production in the Northern Territory in 2030, according to new research by the Australia Institute.
- The NT Government lifted a moratorium on fracking earlier this year
- It promised to ensure fracking would not increase the NT’s net greenhouse gas emissions
- Offsetting these emissions will cost $4.3 billion a year by 2030, a report has found
The huge sum is a warning sign of the mammoth task at hand for those responsible for developing a yet-to-be-implemented emissions offset framework in the Territory.
Chief Minister Michael Gunner is bound by his word after he accepted in-full the fracking inquiry’s recommendation that the NT and Australian governments seek to ensure there is no net increase in greenhouse gas emissions from onshore gas produced in the NT.
“The Government made a very clear undertaking publicly that it would require all emissions to be offset, it’s absolutely essential that it goes ahead,” Australia Institute principal adviser Mark Ogge said.
Mr Gunner indicated that he is waiting on the Federal Government to take the lead on emissions policy.
“There’s been a change of Prime Minister since those conversations [about national emissions policy] have started and the current Australian Government’s policy is not entirely clear,” he said.
“We are hoping for greater clarity on what they intend to do, we know we can do our bit in the Northern Territory.”
NT Chief Minister Michael Gunner said it was “essential” the emissions offset goes ahead. (ABC News: Bridget Judd)
New environmental protection bill announced
After years of what NT Labor described as “careless” environmental management under the previous CLP Government, on Tuesday the Territory Government announced a new environmental protection bill.
The new act mentions an emissions framework, but many of the provisions in the legislation appear to be voluntary.
The Australia Institute’s Mark Ogge says there will be a huge amount of emissions generated through fracking. (Supplied: Australia Institute)
For example, the act states “the Minister may establish an environmental offsets framework for the use of environmental offset measures under this act or an act prescribed by regulation”.
But it also states the CEO of the NT Government “must establish an environmental offset register,” meaning he or she would need to set up a place where companies who are offsetting their emissions would need to log their work.
When it was announced on Tuesday, the environmental protection bill was criticised by the Environmental Defender’s Office as “weak” and kowtowing to industry.
“We are shocked at the NTG announcement that it will narrow/remove repeal rights from the new Environmental Protection Bill before consultation has closed, citing industry concerns,” it said on Twitter.
“This completely undermines trust in commitment to genuine consultation and reform.”
The Arid Lands Environment Centre also raised “serious concerns the Northern Territory Government was being unduly influenced by industry” during the current regulatory reforms.
The research by the Australia Institute looked at Australian Government projections of the price of greenhouse gas emissions in line with the Paris Agreement over the next 50 years.
The institute said the emissions price is expected to rise as time goes on when lower cost abatement measures are exhausted.
“Because fracking emissions are going to be so huge, the cost of offsetting will be huge as well, ” Mr Ogge said.
It also raised concerns about the Territory’s emissions offset policy into the future.
“The gas industry will almost certainly be putting pressure on the Government to water down its commitment to offsetting shale gas emissions,” Mr Ogge said.
Origin Energy declined to comment on the Australia Institute report because they believed it was an industry-wide matter.
While the Australian Petroleum Production and Exploration Association was contacted for comment.
While you’re here… are you feeling curious?