NSW Attorney-General calls for review of sexual consent laws following Four Corners program


Updated

May 08, 2018 08:40:22

The New South Wales Government has referred the state’s consent laws to the Law Reform Commission, following a Four Corners investigation into a high-profile sexual assault case.

Sydney man Luke Lazarus was found not guilty of sexual assault, despite a jury and two judges finding that 18-year-old Saxon Mullins had not consented to sex with him in an alleyway behind his father’s Kings Cross nightclub in 2013.

Ms Mullins was a virgin and on her first night out in the nightclub district with a friend.

She has spoken publicly about the incident for the first time, sharing her story with Four Corners in the hope it will provoke a discussion about consent.

“No-one dreams of their first time being in an alleyway with someone whose name they can’t even remember. No-one wants that,” she told the program.

Mr Lazarus was found guilty and sentenced to five years in prison in his first criminal trial, however a judge overturned that decision on the first appeal.

In the second appeal in November 2017, the Court of Criminal Appeal found that while the judge in the second trial erred, Mr Lazarus would not be retried because it would be unfair to put him through a third trial.

Ms Mullins’ story, and how it was impacted by complicated and nuanced laws around consent, has disturbed New South Wales Attorney-General Mark Speakman who has now referred the laws to the Law Reform Commission.

“[Saxon Mullins has] been humiliated in an alleyway at the age of 18, she’s had to tell her traumatic story in court, she’s had to face two trials, two appeals, and still, no final outcome,” Mr Speakman said.

“From her viewpoint, the whole process has been, I imagine, just a huge disappointment.

“What this shows is that there’s a real question about whether our law in New South Wales is clear enough, is certain enough, is fair enough. That’s why I’ve asked the Law Reform Commission to look at the whole question of consent in sexual assault trials.”

Ms Mullins and Mr Lazarus met on the dancefloor at Soho nightclub and she said minutes later he asked her to go to a “VIP area” but instead took her outside to a dark alleyway.

Ms Mullins said he told her to get on her hands and knees in the gravel and had anal sex with her.

“You know, there wasn’t any request – it was a demand … From someone I had never met before. In a dark alleyway. Alone. And I was scared,” she said.

During his first trial, Mr Lazarus testified he did not swear or raise his voice at Ms Mullins and he honestly believed that she was consenting.

In the second trial, Judge Robyn Tupman found that Mr Lazarus had no reasonable basis for believing Ms Mullins had not consented, but that Ms Mullins, in her own mind, had not consented.

“Whether or not she consented is but one matter. Whether or not the accused knew that she was not consenting is another matter,” she said.

Ms Mullins said the Attorney-General’s decision to refer the relevant consent laws to the Law Reform Commission “makes me feel like I did this for a reason. It wasn’t all for nothing”.

“Maybe someone else won’t have to spend five years fighting to get nowhere,” she said.

Mr Speakman commended Ms Mullins for speaking out about her ordeal.

“This young woman’s bravery in coming forward and sharing her story is commendable. The delay and uncertainty in this matter was unacceptable,” he said.

Topics:

law-crime-and-justice,

sexual-offences,

states-and-territories,

community-and-society,

sydney-2000,

nsw,

australia

First posted

May 08, 2018 06:03:17



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *